Don Edwards Literary Memorial
Compiled and Published by LeRoy Chatfield

Archive for June, 2006

Anniversaries and Happy Friday, LeRoy

Thursday, June 29th, 2006

LeRoy,

Once upon a time I left a monestary. I was, to say the least, unprepared. I had never had a date. I had never danced with a girl. I had not the slightest idea what to do with girl-type-women-of the opposite sex.

But I met this young lady at St. Johns College in Annapolis, Maryland. We were in the math tutorial together. We were in the Greek language tutorial together. We were in the music tutorial together. We were in the biology lab together, cutting up a very dead cat, together. I named our cat “Hugo” and she looked at me strangely. Twice a week we were in the evening seminars…together. I helped her with math and Greek. She was a good kisser. A very well balanced division of skills, I thought at the time.

You will probably be astonished to know I married her…or to be more precise, she married me. I was still clueless but after almost fifty years of marriage, four children, at least six countries lived in, I suspect I am more fortunate than she, poor woman. She’s still very smart, good lookin’, and compassionate.

My very best to you both on your event. I think most relationships, friendship as well as marriage, have much luck associated with them as well as hard work. We are both blessed.

Don

L > WEEK 2008

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

Don,

I know that you are traveling in the fatherland. I hope this essay finds you in good health and a safe place. I have been fussing with this essay for awhile, perhaps too long, and it is time to let it go.

Week 2008

Today marks the end of the two thousand and eighth week of my marriage – our 40th Wedding Anniversary. Is it possible that 40 years have come and gone so quickly? 1966 – 2006, apparently so.

Bonnie and I – well Bonnie, really, because she is creative about such things – decided to celebrate the whole year, not just set aside one special anniversary day. Personal bias aside, I thought it was a splendid idea.

We started our celebration on the north shore of Kauai, a paradise we had never visited. Tragedy was averted when I was rescued by Bonnie and some hiking New Yorkers after I had stumbled, couldn’t right myself, and fell over the side of the Napali Coast trail, clinging to the steep mountainside for dear life – a very close call.

We followed this adventure by casting in with three other couples to rent an apartment on the Embarcadero in San Francisco, the place from which I write this essay. One week a month, Friday to Friday, Bonnie and I live in San Francisco. What a difference a week makes!

On the magic day of the anniversary itself, our only planned event was to return to Bonnie’s parish church in the San Francisco neighborhood where we had been married. The church was half-full this Sunday morning, a sign of the change that has taken place in the American Catholic Church during these intervening 40 years. The makeup of the congregation had also changed: gone were the Irish, replaced by the Asians. And still another change: we were overdressed for this modern-day San Francisco Sunday worship service in St. Cecilia’s.

After the Mass, we caught the next bus on 19th Ave without even knowing where it went. We could have gotten off at the Golden Gate Bridge but neither of us have the stomach for the high wire heights associated with a walk over the bridge, so we stayed put until the end of the line, Fort Mason. A half-mile walk and we were celebrating with our first drink of the day at Ghirardelli Square overlooking San Francisco Bay and Alcatraz Island. San Francisco can be splendid on a beautiful day, and this was certainly one of those days. On to the Ferry Building for a light seafood lunch, this time overlooking the Bay and Treasure Island, and then it was home to South Beach for the afternoon. In the early evening, we walked to North Beach Restaurant for a 1995 Pommard, sweet breads (she), and veal scallopini (he) – a bit pricey perhaps, but a well-deserved and delicious anniversary dinner. (Our wedding night dinner was at Swiss Louis in North Beach, a favorite of ours, but it has long since decamped to join the other nondescript tourist restaurants at Pier 39) After dinner, we walked up Nob Hill to Top of the Mark to enjoy the traditional Irish Coffee and the panoramic San Francisco views. Finally, calling it an evening and a day well-spent, we made our way home by way of the N-Judah street car.

Our next point of celebration will be in Maine at the end of July to vacation with our East Coast daughter and her family. On to Florence and Venice in October and return again to Hawaii for Christmas and New Year’s on the south shore of Kauai with our five daughters, their four husbands, and our nine grandchildren, ranging from age 11 to 3. This Hawaii-close of our 40th year anniversary celebration will be the public, family event of our celebratory year.

It might be expected of someone who has practiced the art of marriage for 2008 weeks to impart some words of wisdom, or least a few tips, for those who may wonder how we managed to escape the 50+ percent divorce rate of our era. Sad to report, I have no such words of wisdom to impart. What I can say with great emphasis is that I was Grade B marriage material and I have arrived at this point in my life only because of the longsuffering and steadfastness of my wife. She guided, or more honestly stated, prodded and pulled me along, as I careened from career to career, abruptly ending some as quickly as I had made the snap decision to undertake it. She saved me from myself more times than I care to remember. A career person herself, she was the marriage partner who organized the family and kept everyone together and on track. Until you have met Bonnie, you have not met Superwoman.

You too, have attended wedding ceremonies of the children of your friends and colleagues, and have heard ministers wax on about partnership, compromise, two-way street, mutual commitment, each one giving 100% and so forth, but the reality is this: if a marriage can be successful, it is because one partner – yes, generally the woman – shoulders the burden of making it work, even when the wheels come off. For my part, I have been the beneficiary of Bonnie’s determination to keep our marriage and family together. This year of celebration especially belongs to her, and I’m most grateful she has included me.

Have a nice Friday, Don.

LeRoy

L > LONG TIME, NO SEE

Sunday, June 11th, 2006

Don,

Here is a curious offering.

There was no parking space immediately in front of the house, but they found one down the block. I walked to meet them, long time no see, I said. Oh, it’s only been 40 years, he replied. We shook hands and embraced, abrazo-style.

He was a young man from the L.A. area, barely 19, if that old, when I first met him in Delano. He was one of the first outside volunteers to join the farmworker movement in 1965. I was not far behind, but a good 12 years older. He left the movement three years later, and I after eight.

Our reunion was the result of his telephone call: he was going to be in Sacramento with his wife, could he come by and see me.? Of course, why not come for an early dinner, and they did. Three plus hours of reminiscing, comparing notes, gossiping about people forty years removed as if it were only yesterday, and bringing one another up-to-date about careers, family, the deceased and the divorced. Time was up, we parted company.

A curious reunion. We had not been friends, but more like comrades in the same fight; we were disparate in age and had maintained no contact these many years, but now his need to want to meet and talk about those days. Those three years, he said, seemed like yesterday, and they reshaped his life forever. Even now, as a university professor, he sees the results of the farmworker movement reflected in some of his students, especially Latinos.

We may never talk again but that does not seem necessary to me. What was important was sharing and reliving, if even for only a few hours, what was a life and death enterprise for each of us when we were young men determined to change the world. It is not likely, I think, that our children will ever have such a reunion, but I do not rule out the grandchildren – a half-century seems about the right spacing.

Take care,

LeRoy

Beheading II

Saturday, June 10th, 2006

LeRoy,

I’m very glad you are adverse to being personally heheaded. We are very much on the same page there.

Our culture likes hanging and sizzling, and more recently, apparently more humane, injection of some bad stuff. It is just too difficult to hang folks now without the impression created by slave days and “reconstruction” days, boy what a euphemism that is.

And electrocution could actually be pretty easy….take a couple of car battery cables, climb the power line and ssssssssssssssst. Much more sensible, especially in a high tech culture like ours. Anybody can lop off a head, but it takes expertise to electrocute a head of state. Pun intended.

I actually have a plan for the end of war as we know it. The UN, with the economic help of the United States, clears one thousand square miles of Antarctica. The UN defines the terms and rules of war. The two or more warring parties can go to a warehouse of war implements and weapons, no nuclears allowed, and no airplanes. There are limits, of course, equal numbers of soldiers….well paid and if they are injured, all expenses paid, if killed, a large stipend goes to their families etc.

There are internationally selected judges, umpires of a sort, striped shirts of course, who adjudicate infractions of the war rules and can impose fines or handicaps (no hand grenades for 30 days for example).

Winning and losing parameters would be well defined ground rules. Both countries have to put some disputed territory in “escrow.” The losing country cedes their escrow land to the winner. The winner gets that territory when the umpires judge the winner.

I probably haven’t thought this out completely, but the whole world could watch on television, thus fulfilling the blood lust needs of the general population of watchers, and the vast sums of “pay per view of war killings” could be distributed to the poor of the world.

I suspect I am either way smarter or way dumber than anyone knows.

Don

L > BEHEADING

Friday, June 9th, 2006

Don,

There is nothing like a beheading – or the threat of a beheading – to strike fear in the hearts of Westerners. I remember as a child going to WWII movies and occasionally coming upon a scene where the Japanese general was standing in front of his POW’s brandishing a sword. Which prisoner would he choose to make an example of? Which prisoner would have his head severed so swiftly and cleanly that he would still be left standing at attention? Grisly, hair-raising and paralyzing stuff to contemplate, and it could only be explained away by the fact that such perpetrators were foreigners, not of our culture or religious beliefs, more akin to ruthless, Godless infidels..

In the Iraq war, we have seen many threats of beheading, in fact one American young man, an engineer from Pennsylvania, I believe, was beheaded. In addition there have been many video threats of Iraqi insurgents standing behind the blindfolded American with a razor-thin scimitar at the ready. Apparently, it is just not Americans who are frozen with fear at the prospect of being beheaded, but Iraqis too. Within the last week, there have been at least two reports of the heads of Iraqi’s delivered to the city center in banana boxes with a note: Beware! This is what happens to traitors! – or words to that effect.

And now Canada: the Internet headlines lead one to believe that their home-grown terrorists were planning to behead the prime minister. News media outlets kill for such headline opportunities – plot to behead prime minister! Who could even imagine such a thing?

Personally, I do not wish to be beheaded. Even the thought sends a shiver down my spine, which after all, is the intent of the threat. But when you compare war apples to war apples, how much different is the threat – and the act – of beheading some one, than say, randomly pulling an Iraqi out of a passing car and executing him on the street, or kicking in the door of an Iraqi residence and executing two dozen family members, or “accidentally” killing a prisoner through the torture method known as waterboarding? Which one is more – or less – humane? Which one is more civilized? More Godless? More ruthless? Perhaps, in the end, there is no difference.

Here is some home grown public relations advice: if you want to create a screaming international headline – true or not – to put the fear of God into the Western populace, threaten to behead someone, but choose wisely: a pope, a president, a prime minister, or a queen are far better publicity choices. Not to worry whether such a beheading is even in the realm of the possible, it is the threat that counts. However, a word of caution: the threat of beheading a head of state is more credible if you own a scimitar.

Have a nice Friday,

LeRoy

L > DON’S VISION STORY

Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

Don,

Your vision story is wonderful. Is this a revised version from the one you sent a year or so ago? Perhaps it just catches me in a more receptive mood, but it seems more understated and more carefully drawn than I remember. Whether revised or not, this story sheds a great deal of light on the state of religious monasticism in the 1950’s.

First point: the absolute role of the religious superior. We were taught that a religious vocation was a calling from God for service but what your story illustrates is a different reality. The religious superior stood in God’s place and based upon his own individualized vision – or even lack of vision – of the purpose of the religious order, and therefore the candidate’s potential contribution to achieve that purpose, he culled out those who did not conform to his own interpretation, and he did so with absolute impunity. His decision was final, not in any sense appealable and even worse, the monastic religious tradition held that his decision was not even to be questioned – blind obedience, it was called. Amazing, when you consider the number and variety of personality-types of religious superiors we were sworn to obey: Edward, Michael, Pius, Xavier, Gabriel. This helps to explain, I think, why the mission purpose of so many religious orders of that era was so mushy and undefined – of course, the original purposes for which they were founded had been mostly abandoned or watered down decades earlier.

Second point: the secretive and mysterious role that spiritual mysticism played in religious life of the 50’s. The mystic, Cora, seemed to have captured a certain sector of the religious-life market, but there were others too. I forget just who, but one of Cora’s followers allowed me to read some of her writing, but only on condition that I was to keep it very hush-hush. Frankly, I could not understand what she wrote but, on the other hand, what is there to understand about religious rapture? You’re raptured or you’re not, and I wasn’t.

Loved your story, very well written with good detail.

LeRoy

6/6/6

Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

How often does something like this happen, LeRoy? I wrote something about 6/9/69 years ago, some purile notice of sexual pecularities on a date.

I’m not confessional by nature, but our dialogue, especially with our common early background, lends itself to it I guess. At first I was crushed by my treatment, but even that summer, as a lifeguard at the Alameda Naval Airbase, I figured the whole thing out. That just wasn’t what I wanted, needed, was meant to be. Then on with it. Brother Robert Smith helped, brokering a scholarship to St. Johns College in Annapolis, the perfect transition place for me, and then it was on with my life.

This was the story I wrote a couple of years ago.

Visions

He had come to a decision. While he waited for his friend and spiritual advisor in this cavernous room, he reviewed in his mind the turmoil of that day, the dreadful meeting with his superior, the Director of the community of student brothers at this small Roman Catholic liberal arts college.

The authorities had decided that he didn’t belong. “Your style has something wanting,” the Director explained matter of factly. It was a stark office with a plain desk, crucifix on the rear wall, a small bookcase and a potted plant very much in need of water. This statement was delivered to the young brother seated in the straight backed chair in front of the desk, conveyed without passion or expression. For this reddition, the face to face counseling session all brothers had with their immediate superior, both wore the traditional black robe with the rabat…a little white dickey worn around the neck in the manner of the centuries old French teaching order of the de la Salle Christian Brothers.

The Director continued. It seems that there were certain types that fit into this complicated life without physical love, owning nothing and requiring absolute obedience to a superior’s whims. He did not fit that profile, the Director said. He was frivolous at times showing, perhaps, a lack of dedication. He often broke the sacred time of silence that began after final prayer and lasted until after Mass and breakfast the next morning. Yes, he was an excellent student but seemed not to have the kind of piety looked for in the dedicated Christian pedagogue. Never mind that his practice teaching in schools showed that he might have superior aptitude for the fundamental objectives of this order….to teach the poor. He could do that as a secular person just as well, couldn’t he? The council had decided that he should leave, but there was no need for haste. He could collect his thoughts and belongings, meager as they were, and leave on the weekend.

“You can call your parents to pick you up. I shouldn’t tell anyone if I were you. It might unsettle some of the other Brothers in some way. You should leave on Sunday, I would say. I would suggest the afternoon while the others are at prayer, but you can decide as long as departure is inconspicuous. It is always easier for everyone concerned to go without any fuss.”

That meeting with the Brother Director was like a pronouncement of doom. This was his family, the only family he ever had really, this motley collection of young men thrown together presumably by a common need to pray, educate and achieve a level of sanctity over their lifetime. Noble causes, a mission, opportunities to make a difference. To shape children’s souls. To dedicate life to lofty ideals and to share with one’s brothers purity of spirit. He was crushed, bewildered. Am I such a bad person? He shuddered. This was completely unexpected. He had planned to finish college, take the final vows of poverty, chastity and obedience, teach for the rest of his life, probably get a PhD in literature, write fiction, help young men reach their potential.

“Do you have any questions,” the Director asked?

He had been so stunned that he could think of none, could not imagine a life without these people. He began to feel panic. Now what? He had no plans. There had not been even a hint of this cold blooded dissection of his faults.

“Good, then. It’s decided. I wish you luck, Brother. You will be in my prayers.” And with that, the Director stood waiting for the young man to leave.

Completely unnerved he had gone straight away to his long time friend and spiritual advisor, a brother he had known since the second grade, a man he trusted. Was it possible to be dismissed in this trivial way? After listening to a torrent of questions for several minutes, Brother Edward had put a gentle hand on the young man’s shoulder. Unlikely, he was told sympathetically. The Director was not known for his diplomatic skills anyway. But what did he want to do? Was this life the right thing for him? After all, Thomas Merton had found a way to be secular and a monk at the same time and he was a member of a cloistered order. The student brother could do the same if he decided to remain a brother. Variations in the rule could always be worked out. How about the vows? Did they seem right for him? This was God’s business after all, but God’s business came in many flavors, Brother Ed had suggested. There was no pecking order to sanctity. You could be a husband, a soldier, a teacher or a prophet.

“George Forman or Cora ….who are we to judge the difference?” Brother Ed chuckled.

Over two years ago as a novice, he had learned about the mystic, a woman his mentor knew intimately but he had never met. The woman was said to have visions. He imagined at the time that she somehow walked with Jesus in her special inward eyes, was told about life and death, the beginnings and end of the world. The meanings of things kept secret. Her name was Cora. Is that any kind of a name for a genuine God seer he wondered at the time? Proper names for the chosen were Theresa, John, Francis. “Cora” seemed so….plain.

But Brother Ed had allowed him to read some of her writings. They seemed to him amazing, though not very well written. Actually talking with God, seeing Him, being given Godly secrets which she should share with the world like Fatima or Guadalupe. She was about God’s big business and she wasn’t even a nun, his advisor had said. Maybe there was a holiness pecking order after all, the young man thought absentmindedly.

He asked his advisor if he had seen Cora recently. Brother Ed shrugged as if to say that it was irrelevant, nodded affirmatively and changed the subject back to the problem at hand.

“Look, Brother, you decide. They can’t decide for you no matter what the Director told you. You have done nothing wrong and I think you will make a wonderful teacher. Your whole life is ahead of you. Take this opportunity to choose what is best for you. You will do well no matter your conclusion. I will back you in any case and you know that.”

They had spent hours wandering together in the hills of the East Bay, browned by the early summer sun talking, sitting quietly, taking in the rather bleak view of the village several miles away. He asked himself the important questions. Why? What is their thinking? What is wrong with me? If many are called but few are chosen why aren’t I chosen? As the day waned, lights blinking on in the distant town, they made their way back silently to the chapel. They had prayed together and he was left that night with his own unspoken thoughts. He wept himself to sleep, ashamed of his emotion. He did not pray. This was not right, not fair. He tried to calm himself, tried to be objective. It was impossible. He awoke the next morning exhausted and very angry.

Instead of going to classes…Latin, The English Novel, Calculus II, Ancient History and Moral Theology…he removed his robe, put on a jacket and walked to town. By the time he returned, hours later, he had decided.

Back in the greeting room, his reverie was interrupted by Brother Edward, stout, affable and energetic, striding through the door. They embraced and the elder brother sat down opposite him in a large, overstuffed chair. The room looked very formal, brocades everywhere, a large cupola surrounding the ceiling like a plaster of Paris crown molding. It was uncomfortable, stuffy, antiseptic.
Huge windows with ponderous, red draperies. Framed pictures of saints on the white walls. He couldn’t help notice the largest one in front, conspicuous with the wide gold leaf frame of the founder of this teaching order, Saint John Baptist de La Salle, a wealthy seventeenth century cleric who was determined to invent ways to teach the poor children of the teaming, industrial slums of France. The saint looked out at them, lips pursed, an almost comically pious demeanor, the obligatory halo behind his head. The young brother had often suspected that this man had to have been much tougher than the prissy image his pictures depicted.

“So, my brother. Have you come to any conclusions? I feel like a failed midwife,” Brother Ed said with a wry smile. “I brought you into this world of men and now………well tell me what’s on your mind.”

He began to explain what he planned to do. If he wasn’t wanted, he would leave. What was the point of staying even if it was possible to appeal? He would finish college elsewhere. Maybe he wasn’t religious or holy enough anyway. Sex would be nice, he said, in an attempt to be amusing.

Brother Edward listened attentively but at the exact instant the word “sex” was uttered, his friend took his eyes away and began to stare at the ceiling where the ornamental crown molding was. He looked distracted. It was as if he saw something no one else could see. The young brother turned to look where Brother Ed was looking. He saw nothing. The older monk continued to stare at the ceiling and opened his mouth as if in wonder. Then he began to stand and slowly turned his body around as if he could see something moving along the wall, over to the opposite corner of the room and then around to the front. He slowly lifted his arms as if in supplication, then fell like a stone to the floor landing heavily on his back, commencing to shake convulsively, his whole body rattling and jerking, his tongue out, eyes back in his sockets showing only white.

“Holy shit,” the young man said aloud. “He’s having a vision.” Hang out with mystics, you become one he wondered?

At last the seizures stopped. Gradually his breathing returned to normal, his eyes closed. After some minutes the young man, still shocked by what he had witnessed, picked his friend up with arms around his body and stretched him out on the uncomfortable straight-backed couch. He wondered if he should call someone, but who do you call for help with a vision? Did Padre Pio have a vision doctor, he wondered? Calling Doctor Apparition! STAT! Instead, he waited patiently. Finally, Brother Ed’s eyes opened. He looked at the young man and propped himself up on one elbow, then sat upright, stretched and said, “I’m sorry. I must have dozed off. I haven’t been feeling well lately.”

The young brother looked at him in disbelief, stammered “What did you see?”

The older man’s eyes narrowed` paused and said, “What are you talking about?”

“You had a vision, didn’t you? What did you see?”

Ed looked at the young man without expression. Then he stretched and stifled a yawn. “I just dozed for a moment. You’ve been reading too much Cora.”

“Wait a minute, Brother Ed. Listen to me.” He went into the details of the seizure, the length of time the man was unconscious. “Look at your watch. Your ‘nap’ took forty-five minutes.”

He looked at his watch, then at the young man. “I’ve been traveling and not getting enough sleep. Last year I had a blackout at the residence, fell down and had a mild concussion. The doctors didn’t find anything serious, but maybe I am feeling some after effects. Don’t worry about it. I’m having my physical next week. Now, tell me what you have decided.”

“I’m leaving. What’s the point? We’ll talk before I go.” Brother Edward started to stand up, seemed to lose his balance momentarily and sat down again. After he rested a few minutes, they both got up and strolled together across the expansive grass in front of the college, unspoken questions lingering, each deep within his own thoughts.

Of course the physical Brother Edward had the following week showed that this was the first of many grand mal seizures he would have most of the rest of his life. The young man would never quite look at religion the same way again, either because of how he perceived he had been treated or because he concluded that real visions didn’t happen. For the first time in his life, he felt that God might be capricious.

On Sunday afternoon, his mother drove up in front of the student brother residence. He took his small suitcase, closed his bedroom door for the last time, walked out the front entrance and viewed the campus, Brother no more.

In the car he turned around for one last look. He remembered the day he had first come to the order, a high school student, a new life to begin, apprehensive, uncertain, hopeful, all of these. Now he was leaving without any goodbyes and finally without regret. It was over.

L > THRIVING WITH MONASTIC TRAINING

Tuesday, June 6th, 2006

Don,

I gave you every opportunity to earn a personal merit badge for your magnanimous – albeit rhetorical – handshake of gratitude with the mysterious and phantom religious superiors who rejected your monastic vocation but you chose instead the high road of full disclosure: a swift kick to their collective privates.

It is true: I profited immensely from those seven years of intense monastic programming – in fact, I thrived. Every minute of every day laid out, nothing left to chance, no decisions to make because there were no choices. Even a military regimen could not be as demanding, I think. Take our summer time prescribed novel reading for example: even though the novels had to be pre-approved, setting aside 90 minutes each afternoon, six days-a-week for required novel reading covered a lot of books.

My leaving monastic religious life was different from yours in at least one respect: I made the decision to leave for the sake of undertaking a new calling. I rejected one calling for the sake of another. In your case, you were, for all intents and purposes, dropped off at a street corner with instructions to find your way forward. (You will recall that other classmates of ours were simply driven to the Napa Greyhound bus depot and given a ticket home. Not even a good-bye, good luck farewell – more like a good riddance.)

Not that I could have lifted a finger of protest, or did, I was always disturbed about how the religious order could dismiss candidates out-of-hand with no thought given, let alone any assistance, to their transition, and even worse, forbidding those who remained behind – God’s chosen ones – from even discussing the departure of their soon-to-be-forgotten friend and colleague. An amazing display of the institutional privilege associated with the Catholic religious-caste system during the 1950’s.

Years later, long after I had left religious life, I often viewed myself as privileged and set apart from others – that I was owed some special respect. Complete nonsense, of course, but it was one of those cultural relics left over from the religious caste system. Yes, I’m afraid there were other such relics, but now at my advanced age and in this forum, and because of 666, I prefer not to become too confessional.

Have a nice Friday, Don.

LeRoy

I lied

Monday, June 5th, 2006

LeRoy,

I have never forgiven the COUNCIL or whoever they were for the heartless way they chose to throw me to the wolves. My “handshake” was rhetorical, reflecting your earlier message. But my life certainly was changed over those five or so years I spent at the Mont and St. Marys, mostly for the better. On the other hand, our 1985 “reunion” at St. Mary’s, our ex-colleagues, had few benevolent feelings either.

The Fratres Scholarum Christianarum in California had none of the spirit of teaching the poor any longer, though you have much more experience about that than I.

My “reclaiming” story doesn’t tell the whole thing, by a long shot. But it is part of my life and was a part of what I wrote on my last message. As we have discussed, whether Jesus would recognize any church now, I think Jean Baptiste de la Salle would be embarrassed, even ashamed, by the order he founded.

My best this Sunday evening, clouds forming, perhaps rain. Thelocal custom is that Saint Anthony is responsible for “juvia”, rain, and if that is the case, storms each evening will happen beginning June 13. We shall see.

Don

L > THE “CHAPTER”, WHOEVER THEY ARE

Sunday, June 4th, 2006

Don,

Your piece keyed to my Richard Halter requiem was both therapeutic (I think) and clever. My own story about not being wanted – or appreciated – by the Christian Brothers came several years after your reddition-story – “the Council questions your vocation.”

I was in my fifth year of teaching in San Francisco and the Brother Visitor came to make his annual inspection visit, and of course, conduct the prescribed reddition with each religious brother. In summary, this ranking religious superior explained to me that because I had taken final vows, I could not be removed from the religious order, but he wanted to make it clear to me that if the “Chapter” had to vote again today about whether to grant me final vows or not, I would be voted out. Talk about being stunned! This man was determined to hurt me, and he did. It was not long after this encounter, I was assigned to teach in Bakersfield where I had the good fortune to meet Cesar Chavez, and eventually leave the religious brotherhood on my own terms. Like you, I have never regretted that decision – indeed, it was a lifesaver! But unlike you, I am not magnanimous enough to shake his hand and say, thank you!

Hot day today in your old hometown.

LeRoy

Reclaiming Lives

Saturday, June 3rd, 2006

LeRoy,

I don’t have any story to be compared with Richard Halter….the closest was with my friend Anthony. But it occurred to me, I may be a reclaimed person for different reasons.

I probably went to Mont la Salle, our boarding “Junior Novitiate” high school because Brother Edward who was the recruiter at the time, convinced me it was a good thing for me to do. I had known him from the second grade so I trusted him. My mother and step father were going through a very complicated and protracted divorce so I guess Brother Ed talked her into it too. So I arrived in Napa, a failing and indifferent student from Christian Brothers School in Sacramento, not interested in much more than playing basketball and I was about 5’ 4” tall. I could not have cared less about math, literature, history, science.

We lived in dorms, got up around 6:00 AM, went to prayers in our chapel, went to Mass, went to breakfast in our cafeteria, were silent all that time, performed cleanup tasks, went to classes, came back for lunch, went to other classes, played sports most of the afternoon, had study time, went to chapel, had dinner, studied, went to chapel again, went to bed, and every day was like every other day.

I began to be interested in reading. I liked the physics labs. Our compatriot, Brother Bede, Jim Van Duren, swallowed a weak acid in an experiment, not dangerous to taste, but he really should not have drank the entire test tube, had the most severe case of heartburn ever seen at the Mont. I got “B”s in Geometry, Trig.

Basically, I began to learn how to study. Brother Robert Smith told me once, “It is easy to be a good teacher, Don. Teach students how to learn and make sure they like learning…then they will be life long students.”

Like you I became a Novice, took vows, spent a year in prayer and meditation, went to St. Marys College, took courses, expected to teach literature the rest of my life and then, one day, I had “redition” with our director, Brother Gabriel. Redition was the regular meeting with one’s superiors, mandatory.

He looked me in the eye and said, “I think you should consider leaving the Brothers. The Council (I had not idea what “THE COUNCIL” was) has questioned your vocation.”

I was stunned. I consulted with my surrogate father, Brother Pius, our Novice Director. He told me that I needn’t pay any attention to the “suggestion.” It was entirely up to me. I walked with Brother Ed for hours. Finally, I decided, who wants to be where he is not wanted, appreciated.

I wrote a story about this, as a matter of fact.

So I left the Brothers, full of resentment, angry, feeling the injustice of the whole episode. But I knew I could succeed in anything I wanted to do. I had a good feeling about my abilities. I was thursty for knowledge and experience.

But I held a major grudge for many years.

Now, though, looking back, two things strike me:
1) Going to the Mont reclaimed my life.
2) Being told I had “no vocation” also reclaimed my life. “The Council,” whoever they were, was right.

So if I can do it at this late date, I extend my hand to Brother Edward and, very reluctantly, to Brother Gabriel, and of course to THE COUNCIL, and echo Richard Halter’s comment:

“I just want to shake your hands and say thank you, you saved my life.”

Don

L > I WANT TO SHAKE YOUR HAND AND SAY THANK YOU, YOU SAVED MY LIFE

Friday, June 2nd, 2006

Don,

Wednesday night at 10:20 p.m. Richard Halter, age 52, was pronounced dead, the victim of an auto accident between a 1987 Dodge Dakota pickup truck and a 1972 Yamaha motorcycle just two miles north of Loaves & Fishes – Richard’s destination. The driver of the truck received minor injuries.

Six years ago, I had barely finished my retirement speech at The Grand in downtown Sacramento, when Richard, a bear of a man, came right up to the podium, threw back his shoulders, cocked his head slightly to the right, took a deep breath, stared me full in the face and said: LeRoy, I just want to shake your hand and say thank you, you saved my life.

I suppressed my defensive (and selfish) urge to deflect and discount his sincerely delivered and forthright compliment; instead, I extended my hand and said: you’re welcome, Richard.

Truth be told, it was Richard who needed to be thanked, he had saved himself from a life of substance abuse, he was clean and sober for the first time in many years, he was in recovery. My role? I had hired him to live at the Loaves & Fishes complex and work in the night watch program.

It has taken me several years to understand what Richard meant when he screwed up his courage that night at The Grand to look me in the eye and say his piece. What he meant goes something like this: I was in bad shape, I knew it, but I couldn’t ask for help. I didn’t believe in myself, I had let everyone down, I was no good. I got what I deserved. Loaves & Fishes accepted me, fed me, kept me alive, believed in me, and slowly I began to believe in myself. I wanted to walk the painful path of recovery.

It was not LeRoy Chatfield, it was the quiet, unassuming, welcoming, non-judgmental every day work of providing survival services through the charity, Loaves & Fishes, that was the lifeline for a hurting person like Richard. He simply paid tribute to the gospel spirit of providing a cup of cold water to a thirsty person, in the only way he knew how – to the retiring director.

And for my part, I say: Richard, I cannot shake your hand, but I just want to say thank you, you saved my life.

May he rest in peace.

LeRoy

Iran and other matters

Friday, June 2nd, 2006

LeRoy,

Went to Colima, the volcano city, with daughter Tracie and Judy (Valerie’s youngest sister) and friend. Nothing special, nice plaza as in all Mexican cities, virtually no good restaurants, then missed the city wanted to visit on the coast and drove all day to get back. Won’t go there, I assure you, when you come for a visit.

It is hard to fathom the Condoleeza Bush Rumsfeld Cheney reasoning about anything now. They are so inept and so hated throughout the world that their influence is not taken seriously…..more and more so in Latin America. I would not be surprised if we actually attacked Iran.

Underestimating adversaries is a tradition in our species, Napoleon and Hitler both underestimated the Russians. Valerie and I went on an archeological dig in South Africa a couple of years ago, the very first exploration of the battle of Isandluanda, a massacre of British troops by Zulu warriors. The British were poorly bivouacked, and even with greatly superior weapons, a few hundred well trained soldiers were no match for 20,000 world class Zulu athletes with old guns and spears. Likewise Custer….poorly bivouacked and underestimated the ferocity and determination of a bunch of “savages.”

I am afraid that our governmental process, our Constitution, has been hijacked by big business and I don’t see any change in our lifetime. As pessimistic as that sounds, can you imagine what you and Cesar and your colleagues would do now with the duplicitous rhetoric about “illegal aliens” with cheap labor wanted by many businesses in the US and of course, the Mexican government likes the idea of getting their people jobs, legal or not, in the US. Takes the pressure off of them.

Good Friday to you, too, LeRoy. Friday the 13th comes on a Thursday in June.

Don